Past Popes Condemn Vatican II
and its Heresies
|
|
 |
But NO, these chameleons are the most dishonest of worms, and they keep the name Catholic, the very name they despise. It goes to show the depths these degenerates have sunk to.
We will examine the 16 Encyclicals that condemn this new and false Council (Vatican II) that the Jews/Masons have created. It is not my intention to cover each of these encyclicals in its entirety. It is enough to name them and to summarize the content of each.
1. “Mirari Vos” by Pope Gregory XVI, Aug.
15, 1832.
The Errors of Liberalism were condemned by Pope Gregory XVI. This Encyclical
slams the many modernist ideas that have cropped up in Vatican II, so the
errors we see are not new ones at all. They come from the Father of Lies
and are constantly regurgitated.
2. “Quanta Cura” by Pope Pius IX, Dec 8,
1864.
This encyclical deals with unjust civil laws (from the Freemason republics)
that replace Church laws on marriage and education.
3. “Syllabus of Errors” by Pope Pius IX,
Dec 8, 1864.
This Encyclical is usually tied with the above Quanta Cura. It has
80 condemned propositions and the 80th is the one used by the Modernist
new anti-popes of the New Order Church; i.e. the pope must accommodate
himself to the thinking of the world. By this definition “world”
is meant all those Sects and Masonic bodies that now control ALL of the
media, the schools in academia, the Governments as well as banking and
trade.
4. “Diuturnum Illud” by Pope Leo XIII, June
29, 1881.
False opinions and actions of Government Authority were condemned by
Pope Leo XIII. Again, this Encyclical backs up his predecessor Pius
IX on the rampaging demands being made by Masonic state-controlled Governments,
especially in France, Italy, Portugal, Spain, Belgium, Germany and so on.
We are witnessing the rise of the super-state in the new World Order which
is the culmination of nearly 200 years of work by the Secret Societies.
They have also been condemned by the same past Popes.
5. “Humanum Genus” by Pope Leo XIII, April.
20, 1884.
Freemasonry and Naturalism are condemned by Pope Leo XIII in this Encyclical.
Need we say more when the present Vatican (of John Paul II) now has Eleven
Lodges within its boundaries. The first of the anti-popes, John XXIII was
himself a freemason and his successor was also eulogized by the top ranking
Masons as well. Paul VI stated the Masonic belief in the closing speech
of Vatican II on Dec. 7, 1965, which I shall insert below. The article
was written by the Abbe Georges de Nantes in his CRC Bulletins:
II. Second grievance: that of having reproached “pope” Paul VI and Vatican II for introducing the religion of MAN who makes himself god, in the place of the authentic Catholic faith.I thus consider it necessary to recall here the principal documents relating to this unprecedented novelty, the consequences of which have been and still are so damaging to the Church:The Decree has the merit -- or the imprudence -- of expounding perfectly the principal reproach, that without reply, I have made for thirty-five years against the Conciliar revolutionaries: that of having introduced into the Church the Cult of Man who makes himself god in the place of the cult of God Who made Himself man, Our Lord Jesus Christ.
Two interpretations are possible for the first judicial justification: either Mgr. Daucourt is convinced that the religion of man was well and truly established at that time, and that it is a good thing, and that no one has the right to reproach the “pope” and the Conciliar Fathers for it (the literal interpretation of the justification); or else Mgr. Daucourt quotes my objections in derision, being persuaded that the Catholic faith remains in tact and that the Council did not innovate in this matter (the benign interpretation, but just as scandalous and offensive).
Closing speech of Vatican II, pronounced by Paul VI, 7th December 1965
(Documentation Catholique # 1462, 2nd January 1966, col. 63-64):
“The Church of the Council, it is true, was not content to reflect on her own private nature, and on the relations that unite her to God; she was also much attached with man as he really is today, with living man, with man totally taken up with himself, with man who not only makes himself the centre of his own interests, but who dares to claim that he is the principle and final cause of all reality. Man in his phenomenal totality, that is to say, arrayed in all his manifold aspects, presented himself, as it were, before the assemble of the Council Fathers....In former times the Church held the thrice-holy God, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, to be its unique Lord. During these years of the Council, or more accurately, during the hidden and then ‘official’ reign of J.B.Montini who became Paul VI, (or more correctly Paul 666) things changed. To this unique pole of attraction that God, His Son and His Spirit represented for the faithful and the holy Spouse of Christ, was imperceptibly added another pole, an antagonistic one, Man. A day came when these orientations and polar attractions were suddenly inverted; from the fixed point, God, everything became focused on the new one, MAN. (CRC # 185, November 1985, p. 14).“Secular, profane, humanism finally revealed itself in all its terrible stature and, in a certain sense, challenged the Council. The religion of God made man has come up against the religion -- for there is such a one -- of man who makes himself God. And what happened? a clash, a battle, an anathema? That might have taken place, but it did not. It was the old story of the Samaritan that formed the model for the spirituality of the Council. It was filled only with an endless sympathy. The discovery of human needs -- and these are so much greater now that the son of the earth has made himself greater-absorbed the attention of the Synod. Recognize at least this our merit, you modern humanists who have no place for the transcendence of things supreme, and come to know our new humanism: we also, we more than anyone else, have the CULT OF MAN. And so what was it about this humanity that was considered by this august Senate, which set about studying it in the light of the divinity? It considered once again the two-sided face of man : his wretchedness and his greatness, his profound, undeniable, and of itself incurable sinfulness, and the goodness that he retains, a goodness that is always marked with a hidden beauty and an invincible sovereignty …
“A current of affection and admiration overflowed from the Council over the modern world of man … let no one ever claim that a religion like the Catholic religion is useless, since in its most self-aware and efficacious form, as is evidenced in a Council, it proclaims itself to be entirely in the service of man’s well-being. The Catholic religion and life itself thus reaffirms their allegiance, their convergence on a single human reality : the Catholic faith exists for humanity; in a certain sense, it is the life of humanity..... ”
“For us, these two cults, that of God Who makes Himself man, and that of Man who makes himself god, are radically irreconcilable. The first is of God, the second is of Satan. The Gospel of Jesus Christ commands every creature “to adore God alone and to worship none but Him”(Luke 4: 8). We also know with what zeal the faithful were put on guard, during the Council and afterward, against the exaggerated of the Virgin Mary and the Saints!! And lo, in violation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ we bow behold this new Humanism in a Church which proclaims from the mouth of this “pope” and to the “applause” of the world that she “more than anyone else has the cult of Man”!! (CRC for May 1979, p.1).Numerous quotations from the Scriptures, the Fathers of the Church, the Saints and the Popes of all ages, infallible by virtue of their adherence to the revealed doctrine of the Ordinary and Universal Magisterium of the Church, could be quoted against this cult of Man, of which “pope” Paul VI makes himself the herald. Among them, I cannot resist quoting what Pope Saint Pius X taught in his first Encyclical, which answers word for word the pontifical discourse of the 7th December 1965. Here is the text, copied from the editorial of the first number of La Contre-Reforme Catholique au XXe siecle (October 1967):
“We proclaim that We have no other aim in exercising the Supreme Pontificate than that of restoring all things in Christ, so that Christ may be all in all ...We intend to be nothing other in the midst of human society than the minister of God with whose authority We are invested. His interests are Our interests. For these We are resolved to spend all Our strength and Our very life. In our days it is only too true that the nations have raged and the peoples have devised vain things against their Creator. More and more frequently God’s enemies cry out: “Depart from us.” Wherefore, among the majority of men We find total rejection of all respect for God and no regard paid in the habits of public and private life to His Sovereignty. On the contrary, every effort and every artifice is employed to blot out the memory and the knowledge of God...The speech of Paul VI quoted above is not the simple rhetorical exercise, something incidental and without great “magisterial” value. It is the charter of a doctrinal revolution started during the Council and continued down to today. These words reflect the “spirit”[4] which has guided the Acts of Vatican II, especially the Declaration of Dignitatis Humane -- on Religious Liberty. In the practical sphere, they were followed by the unrestrained exaltation of the inalienable dignity of every man and the enthusiastic proclamation of the Freemason “Rights of Man,”[5] beliefs that spread throughout the world and right into parish life. In our diocese, this cult of man is expressed during Sunday services when in place of the Credo (the I believe in God), the following strange hymn is sung, devoted to the glory of the Idol of modern times: “I believe in God who believes in Man.”“Considering these things, there is good reason to fear that this great perversity of minds may be the foretaste and the beginning of those evils, reserved for the last times, and indeed the son of perdition, of whom the Apostle speaks may already by in the world.[1] In very truth, We cannot think otherwise in virtue of the audacity and wrath employed everywhere in persecuting religion, in combating the dogmas of the faith, in the firm determination to uproot and destroy all relations between man and the Divinity. Moreover, and according to the same Apostle this is the distinguishing mark of the antichrist, with unlimited boldness, man has put himself in the place of God. He has done this in such a way that although he cannot utterly extinguish in himself all knowledge of God, he has condemned God’s majesty and made the world a temple in which he himself is to be adored.[2]
“And that is why the end to which all our efforts must tend is to restore the human race to the empire of Christ ... If, however, Our desire to obtain this end is to be fulfilled, we must use every means and make every effort to bring about the total disappearance of that enormous and detestable wickedness so characteristic of our times - the substitution of man for God. Once this is accomplished, We must restore the sacred laws and counsels of the Gospel to their ancient position of honor. We must boldly proclaim the truths taught by the Church…” [3]
(Saint Pius X, Encyclical “E Supremi Apostolatus,” 4th October 1903.)
The doctrinal basis for this Cult of Man was already present in the Acts of the Council.[6] Read this crucial text from the pastoral constitution, “The Church in the Modern World (Gaudium et Spes of Paul VI):
“Human nature, by the very fact that it was assumed, not absorbed in him (Christ) has been raised in us also to a dignity beyond compare. For, by his incarnation, He, the Son of God, has in a certain way united Himself with each man.” (# 22 § 2). [7]While studying the Acts of Vatican II in 1971-1972, I had pointed out even then the aberrant consequences of this theory: “In short Christ had made man divine, every man! The whole of this chapter piles up the Christian dogmas, but it is all done to wind up without any warning in an absolutely novel theory ... leading us to believe that all men have already been divinised by Christ.” (CRC. September 1972) [8]
6. “Libertas Praestantissimum” by Pope Leo
XIII, June 20, 1888.
On the nature of (False) Liberty condemned by Leo XIII in his Encyclical
.
7. “Rerum Novarum” by Pope Leo XIII, May
15, 1891.
On the Condition of the Working class, here Pope Leo XIII set out the
true Catholic teaching his Encyclical.
8. “Graves de Communi” by Pope Leo XIII,
Jan 18, 1901.
On Christian Democracy, as distinct from Masonic “democracy.”
9. “Lamentabile Sane” (Syllabus Condemning
the Errors of the Modernists) by Pope St. Pius X, July 3, 1907.
Condemns the present Modernism which is rife in Vatican II.
10. “Pascendi Dominic Gregis” by Pope St.
Pius X, Sept. 8, 1907.
Modernism, the Apostasy dissected again by the masterful Pontiff and
his Cardinal Secretary of State Merry del Val, in his Encyclical. The two
above encyclicals written by the Infallible Magisterium stand in stark
contradiction to what the current false teaching that comes form Rome today.
Nothing so well documented as these two with its Oath against Modernism,
thrown out by Paul VI, who we believe to be the Man of Sin Paul 666 is
we believe to be the fulfillment of the prophecy of St. Paul (II Thess
ch.2) of the universal apostasy that has finally arrived on all of mankind
for the Final Days on earth for the vast majority of mankind.
11. “The Sillon” by Pope St. Pius X, Aug
25, 1910.
On Our Apostolic Mandate, this Encyclical exposes the hypocrisy of
the so-called Catholics that label themselves as “liberal Catholics.” The
term is contradictory. It is like saying that black is white, that heaven
is hell. How often have we heard the same labels now used in this new Church
of the Novus Ordo, giving labels to the various opinions in this cosmopolitan
and heterodox new church of Vatican II.
12. “Oath Against Modernism” by Pope St. Pius X, Sept. 1, 1910.
13. “Quas Primas” by Pope Pius XI, Dec.
11, 1925.
On the Feast of Christ the King by Pope Pius XI .We have seen Christ
de-throned by the secular world and now joined by the Novus Ordo Church
in particular by the rebellious Priests led by the Jesuits.
14. “Mortalium Animos” by Pope Pius XI,
Jan 6, 1928.
On fostering true religious Unity, as distinct from the false teachings
of Vatican II, ecumenism was condemned by Pope Pius XI in his Encyclical.
This Encyclical was the stumbling block to the Innovators of Vatican II,
but with “experts” like Fr. Courtney Brown S.J., they worded around the
schema in such ways as to make it sound that Ecumenism is what God wanted
when it is in fact against the natural and divine law.
15. “Divini Redemptoris” by Pope Pius XI,
March 19, 1937.
Atheistic Communism was condemned by Pius XI in his Encyclical. It
is also worthy of note, that the current anti-pope, John Paul II himself,
was the recipient of many favors from the Communist Government of Poland.
Cardinal Wyzinski on the other hand was kept under house arrest, and many
clerics languished in jail. Not so the current John Paul II. He was given
unprecedented travel overseas to attend the many seminars on “phenomenology”
to which he is a keen and avid supporter. When he was attending the false
Council Vatican II, he was one of those “fellow-travelers” of communism
who made sure that the schema on Communism was shelved and not discussed.
16. “Humani Generis” by Pope Pius XII, April
12, 1950.
The last of the 16 Encyclical was written by the late Pius XII, called
“On Certain false opinions which threaten to undermine the foundations
of Catholic Doctrine.”
This puts to rest the lie given in many of the rebuttals coming to this office from the defenders of this new man-worshipping religion, that Pius XII was one of its supporters. There is nothing worse in sin than a liar. It is roundly condemned in Scripture. Pope Pius XII was condemning the many private opinions being circulated even by the infidel bishops. They experimented with the new services facing the people in the late 1940’s. That was how far the power of the Modernists had arisen, and how much the late Pope was “imprisoned” by an elect guard surrounding him. It was then permitted by God that Vatican II would be called into being as a just punishment on all of mankind, especially the new clergy. Many of those who have since died after having worked for this change, are no doubt realizing their just deserts in the fires of Hell.
Every new change since Vatican II was already condemned in this Encyclical.
The book of these Encyclicals can be obtained from:
October 19, 1999
Geelong, Australia
Footnotes
- Paul 666 was already then 6 years old. He was elected at the age of 66, on the 6th month and sitting in the 6th chair.
- That is why the old Altars have been thrown out and the tables placed FACING the people- the new gods to be worshipped though they know it not as yet, and what we see in modern churches today is in fact the Masonic Temple of Lucifer.
- A providential remark as if St. Pius X was looking at that time in October 1998
- Since it is NOT the Holy Ghost, then it MUST be that of Satan.
- First proclaimed by the Masonic revolutionaries during the French Revolution and “protected” by the Guillotine for one and all who might disapprove of the godless tenets of their reign
- Of Vatican II, an Illicit Council, called by a non-pope in John XXIII, himself also a freemason and thus excommunicated and also “tacitly resigned” from ALL offices in the Church ( Canon 188 # 4 )
- Notice the slights attributed to God by the use of the lower case such as “in him” instead of in Him, the incarnation instead of the Incarnation and so on. It shows a contempt for Christ and no wonder when most of these “Fathers” were Masons or Satanists.
- This could very well be the “abomination in the holy place” (Daniel ch.8 & 12 )
