In science you possess what you put into the formula. If a person makes a mixture or combination of H2O he has water. If another person makes a mixture or combination of H2O2 he has hydrogen peroxide. If the person with the formula of H2O2 claims that he has water, that is a mistake or a fraud. It is obvious that changing the formula changes the product.
From the time of St. Peter until the death of Pope Pius XII the formula for Pope never changed. The Pope always had two very important prerogatives, namely, the prerogative of primacy of jurisdiction in the whole Church over every Cardinal, Bishop, priest and layman. Secondly, he had the prerogative of papal infallibility as taught by all the Popes, (church fathers) and finally defined as a dogma by Pope Pius IX.
The primacy of jurisdiction is set forth in a wonderful way by Pope Boniface VIII in his bull called “Unam Sanctam,” (November 18, 1302). In Denzinger, “The Sources of Catholic Dogma," this primacy of the Pope most clearly defined in number 469. After explaining how there are two swords in the world, the material and the spiritual, he zeros in on the supremacy of jurisdiction of the Pope. It is with total approval and unity of mind and will that We quote Boniface VIII.
We quote from # 469 in Denzinger:
“For it is necessary that a sword be under a sword and that temporal authority be subject to spiritual power ... “For it is necessary that a sword be under a sword and that temporal authority be subject to spiritual power ... It is necessary that we confess the more clearly that spiritual power precedes any earthly power both in dignity and nobility, as spiritual matters themselves excel the temporal ... For, as truth testifies, spiritual power has to establish earthly power, and to judge if it was not good ... Therefore, if earthly power deviated, it will be judged by spiritual power; but if a lesser spiritual deviates, by its superior; but if the supreme (spiritual power deviates) it can be judged by God alone, not by man, as the Apostle testifies: ‘The spiritual man judges all things, but he himself is judged by no one’ [I Cor. 2:15]. But this authority, although it is given to man and is exercised by man, is not human, but rather divine, and has been given by the divine Word to Peter himself and to his successors in him, whom the Lord acknowledged an established rock, when he said to Peter himself: ‘Whatsoever you shall bind’ etc. [Matt. 16:19].”In addition We quote with unity of mind and will, from Pope Pius IX, from THE VATICAN COUNCIL (1869 -1870) Session IV (July 18, 1870) in #1831. This topic is reduced to a formal Canon as follows: "pertain to faith and morals, but also in those which pertain to the discipline and government of the Church spread over the whole world; or, that he possesses only the more important parts, but not the whole plenitude of this supreme power; or that this power of his is not ordinary and immediate, or over the churches altogether and individually, and over pastors and the faithful altogether and individually: let him be anathema.” For this brief treatise it does not seem necessary to add to what has been said regarding the supreme ruling power of the Pope. The next step is to explain briefly the infallibility of the Pope as taught from the time of St. Peter to the time of the death of Pope Pius XII on the ninth of October 1958.
Our Lord Jesus Christ spoke (as found in Luke 22:32) the following:
“I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and thou, being once converted, confirm thy brethren.”We quote three numbers from Denzinger, THE VATICAN COUNCIL (1869 -1870). They are as follows.
#1837 “So, this gift of truth and a never failing faith was divinely conferred upon Peter and his successors in this chair, that they might administer their high duty for the salvation of all; that the entire flock of Christ, turned away by them from the poisonous food of error, might be nourished on the sustenance of heavenly doctrine, that with the occasion of schism removed the whole Church might be saved as one, and relying on her foundation might stay firm against the gates of hell.We are now ready to move into the muddy waters of the Novus Ordo, Council Vatican II, false church. There seems to be a total absence of any doctrine in regard to possessing infallibility in the Novus Church. When they determined to corrupt doctrine they stirred up the mud of error without claiming to be infallible. They knew that if they called themselves Catholic the gullible public would swallow their teaching of intellectual and moral sewage. They totally neglected to stay in line with two thousand years of ecclesiastical tradition.#1838 [Definition of infallibility] “But since in this very age, in which the salutary efficacy of the apostolic duty is especially required, not a few are found who disparage its authority, We deem it most necessary to assert solemnly the prerogatives which the Only-begotten Son of God deigned to enjoin with the highest pastoral office.
#1839 “And so We, adhering faithfully to the tradition receive from the beginning of the Christian faith, to the glory of God, our Savior, the elevation of the Catholic religion and the salvation of Christian peoples, with the approbation of the sacred Council, teach and explain that the dogma has been divinely revealed, that the Roman Pontiff, when he speaks ex cathedra, that is, when carrying out the duty of the pastor and teacher of all Christians in accord with his supreme apostolic authority he explains a doctrine of faith or morals to be held by the universal Church, through the divine assistance promised him in blessed Peter, operates with that infallibility with which the divine Redeemer wished that His church be instructed in defining doctrine on faith and morals; and so such definitions of the Roman Pontiff from himself, but not from the consensus of the Church, are unalterable.
#1940 [Canon] “But if anyone presumes to contradict this definition of Ours, which may God forbid: let him be anathema.”
Before going into the Novus Ordo’s aberrations of doctrine it will be good to study two canons in their 1983 up-dated Canon law. It should be kept in mind that We see nothing of divine assistance in anything that was done by the false Catholic Church of Vatican II. We study their manifestation of error for only one reason, and that is, to help others who do not know that they are in error. The truth will make you free from error and the dreadful consequences of being in this condition which of course is the path to hell.
Over the years since Vatican II stole the church Christ founded for the faithful, the Abbe Georges de Nantes has pointed out and condemned very many of the errors of the Novus Ordo Church.
Lest those who read this material taken from the works of Abbe Georges de Nantes get confused over the wording used by the same Abbe, We find it very necessary to clear up one very important point. While seeing almost universal heresy in the church, now in Rome, Georges de Nantes, nevertheless, calls it one, holy, catholic and apostolic. Put it this way. One who tries to cleanse the evil and foulness of the heresies from inside this false Sect, he will not be effective nor credible as another would be who cleanses the diseases created by the Robber Church from a safe distance outside this mess. You will never find Us associating Ourselves (meaning, Ourselves plus all the former true Popes) as members of the Novus Ordo false Church.
Please keep this distinction between Our writings and those of Georges de Nantes. In his THE CATHOLIC COUNTER-REFORMATION of January 1984 he has this to say:
II. Collegial-democratic government of the Church. “Having shaken the Church’s unity of faith, today’s modernists are striving to shake the Church’s unity of government and hierarchical structure.It is important to make it clear that all bishops are equal in the powers that come from the sacrament of Holy Orders. The Pope is no more sacramental bishop than all the other bishops in the world. The point in the present discussion is this: are they all equal in the power to rule, and that power is called jurisdiction?“The doctrine already suggested by the Second Vatican Council document ‘Lumen Gentium’ will be explicitly adopted by the new Canon Law (We know now that it came out in 1983) (Can. 336): a doctrine whereby the college Bishops together with the Pope ALL equally enjoy supreme power in the Church, habitually and constantly. (stress markings are Ours)
“This doctrine of a double supreme power is contrary to the teaching and practice of the Church’s Magisterium, especially in the First Vatican Council (Dz. 3055) and in Leo XIII’s Encyclical “Satis Cognitum”. The Pope alone has this supreme power which he communicates as he judges opportune and in extraordinary circumstances.
“Linked to this grave error is the democratic orientation of the Church, with powers residing in the “People of God" as defined in the New Code of Canon Law. This Jansenist error was condemned by Pius VI’s Bull ‘Auctorem Fidei.’ ( Denz. 1501).
“This tendency to have the ‘base’ share in the exercise of power is to be found in the institution of the Episcopal Synod and Conferences, in priests’ and pastoral councils and in the proliferation of both Roman and national Commissions, also to be found in religious congregations (on this subject see First Vatican Council, Denz. 3061 - the New Code of Canon Law, can. 447).
“Degradation of authority in the Church is the source of the anarchy and disorder prevailing everywhere in the Church today.”
The Novus Ordo, with its 1983 New Code of Canon law, makes it clear that all the bishops of the world, including the Pope, are equal. All that is conceded to their Pope is that he is primus inter pars. He is first among equal parts. Now the mainline Protestants have what they have been demanding since the start of their Protestant rebellion. Finally, Rome as seen today, is exactly like they are: just one more Protestant sect.
For the benefit of those who are without a Novus Ordo 1983 Code of Canon law We shall quote Canon 336 (the one referred to above by Georges de Nantes). It is:
“The head of the College of Bishops is the Supreme Pontiff, and members are the Bishops by virtue of their sacramental consecration and hierarchical communion with the head of the College and its members. This College of Bishops, in which the apostolic body abides in an unbroken manner, is in union with its head and never without this head, also the subject of supreme and full power over the universal Church. (We added the highlighting.)The next number of the New Code treats with the exercise of that equally posed ruling power as follows: Canon 337:
Number 1: “The College of Bishops exercises its power over the universal Church in solemn form in an Ecumenical Council.”
Number 2 “It exercises this same power by the united action of the Bishops dispersed throughout the world, when this action is as such proclaimed or freely accepted by the Roman Pontiff, so that it becomes a truly collegial act.” (Our highlighting)In very clear language, as We quoted him above, Pope Boniface VIII in Unam Sanctam, professed the doctrine of the supreme authority of the Roman Pontiff. He is above all the bishops, individually and even when they are all gathered in a Council. Likewise, Pius XII again reiterated that the Pope has supreme power over every individual in the Church, be they alone or in union with others.Number 3 “It belongs to the Roman Pontiff to select and promote, according to the needs of the Church, ways in which the College of Bishops can exercise its office in respect of the universal Church in a collegial manner.”
Another step, in proving that the Novus Ordo church has no Pope, is by proving that the man they call the Pope propagates, as a doctrine to be believed by all, something that had been universally condemned by all previous Roman Pontiffs. Our source of their false teaching is Walter Abbot’s book, THE DOCUMENTS OF VATICAN II, Guild Press, New York with the imprimatur of Lawrence Cardinal Shehan, Archbishop of Baltimore, dated February 14, 1966.
We shall quote the pages and numbers as found in the above-mentioned work. On page 692 number 12 we read:
“The Church therefore is faithful to the truth of the gospel, and is following the way of Christ and the apostles when she recognizes, and gives support to, the principle of religious freedom as befitting the dignity of man and as being in accord with divine revelation.”This official statement really gives Us the leverage to claim that what they say about “religious freedom” is their newly-formulated dogma. If, what they teach, is (1) from the way of Christ, (2) and the Apostles and (3) in accord with divine revelation, then it just has to be a dogma - if the “Pope” puts his full authority behind it with the words found on page 696 of the above source.(highlighting Ours) (Abbot).
Here is the final proof from Paul VI of his status as a non-Pope:
“Each and every one of the things set forth in this Declaration has won the consent of the Fathers of this most sacred Council. We too, by the apostolic authority conferred on us by Christ, join with the Venerable Fathers in approving, decreeing, and establishing these things in the Holy Spirit, and we direct that what has thus been enacted in synod be published to God’s glory. Rome, at St. Peter’s, December 7, 1965. I, Paul, Bishop of the Catholic Church.” (Our highlighting)To one and all, if or when We define as Paul VI (a non-Pope) has done above, let it be known that We shall be declaring a dogma of the faith. Why? It is because all Our predecessors wrote that way when they proclaimed a dogma of the faith.
Our next step is to put down what actually is in the false Vatican II document on Religious Freedom. On page 678 & ff. paragraph 2 we read:
“The Vatican Synod declares that the human person has a right to religious freedom.... The Synod further declares that the right to religious freedom has its foundation in the very dignity of the human person, as this dignity is known through the revealed Word of God and by reason itself. This right of the human person to religious freedom is to be recognized in the constitutional law whereby society is governed. Thus it is to become a CIVIL RIGHT....”(Our highlighting)We now turn to Pope Pius IX’s Encyclical QUANTA CURA of December 8, 1846 (Denz. 1689). We quote the truth:
“And also, contrary to the teaching of Sacred Scripture, of the Church, of the most holy Fathers, they do not hesitate to assert that ‘the best condition of society is the one in which there is no acknowledgment by government of the duty of restraining, by establishing penalties, offenders of the Catholic religion, except insofar as the public peace demands.’”We continue to quote from paragraph 1690 of Quanta Cura:
“And, from this false idea of social organization they do not fear to foster that erroneous opinion, especially fatal to the Catholic Church and to the salvation of souls, called by our predecessor of recent memory, Gregory XVI, insanity; namely, that ‘liberty of conscience and of worship is the proper right of every man, and should be proclaimed and asserted by law in every correctly established society; ...”Pope Pius IX continues to castigate his opponents by saying they are preaching a “liberty of perdition,” and that “if human opinions always have freedom for discussion, there could never be wanting those who will dare to resist truth, and to trust in the eloquence of human (al. mundane) wisdom, when faith and Christian wisdom know from the very teaching of our Lord Jesus Christ how much it should avoid such harmful vanity.”
It is absolutely clear that the teachings on religious freedom as found in all the Church teaching up to the death of Pope Pius XII are diametrically opposed to those that came out during the sessions of false Council Vatican II. Furthermore, John Paul II and his Cabal of innovators stand firmly behind the documents of Council Vatican II. For those who have faith there is only one conclusion. The teachings of Council Vatican II (really, their attempted dogmatic decrees) are heretical. They are so heretical that they do not even remain in the realm of human intelligence. We saw that Pope Pius IX agreed with Pope Benedict XVI when he called the freedom of religion as defined in Council Vatican II as insanity. We have to tell the unwary: there is a step below heresy, and that is insanity. He who takes a fool seriously is himself a fool.
We come back to our original contention. There is no Pope in the Vatican II church. Two proofs have been put forward. First of all, in the 1983 New Code of Canon Law there is a definition of the Pope telling one and all that “all the bishops are equal (in ruling power).” It is like a ruling chamber in government. The assembly elects a speaker as its chairman. However, that chairman has no more ruling power than all the rest of the members. That is not true of the true Roman Pontiff. He has the primacy of jurisdiction as explained above. The Pope has the fullness of ruling power over the whole world, spiritual and material, as explained above.
The true Pope has infallibility, as We explained above. If, perchance, a man is thought to be the Pope, and it is proved that he defined as true what actually is error, you know for sure that he is not the Pope, for God made it, so that the true Pope cannot teach an error when defining doctrine in faith and morals for the whole Church. John Paul II, in placing himself in complete agreement with the heretical (insane) teachings of false Council Vatican II, is showing all men who have the gift of faith that he is not the true Roman Pontiff, not the Vicar of Christ and not the successor of St. Peter.
Let those who, in God’s mercy, still have divine and Catholic faith abandon the sinful Goliath now ruling in Rome and become subject to Us, Pope Pius XIII, who was elected Pope in a valid election on October 24, l998.
Postscript:
The above material for the most part was taken from two articles of Ours. The first was a two-sheet article on the papacy that We developed shortly after the appearance of the New Code of Canon Law. The second one is a two sheet letter addressed to “My Relatives and Friends” dated August 19, 1989, and they are available for interested persons. Those who oppose the known truth sin against the Holy Ghost, a sin that cannot be forgiven in this world and in the next - because the sinner refuses to repent and ask for forgiveness. Obviously, such persons (if dying unrepentant) will find themselves in the “exterior darkness where there is the weeping and gnashing of teeth” - forever.
Pius, pp. XIII
December 21, 1998
Top of Page |
Pope's
Homepage |
Email |
 |