![]() |
![]()
Venerable Brethren and members of the Catholic faith, The Catholic Church has lain in the tomb for the last forty years in the spiritual wilderness. Our predecessors’ warnings had fallen on deaf ears. The Enemy of Christ Our Lord and God was by then well established within the bowels of our Holy Church. It was time for God to expose them to those with the “eyes of the faith.” 1 - The Teaching of the Church of ChristPope Innocent III, in concert with the Fourth Ecumenical Council of the Lateran, gave expression to the teaching of the Church in these words; “There is ONLY ONE Universal Church, outside of which absolutely no one will be saved”. This teaching is de fide. Pope Gregory XVI said that it is “one of the most important and most obvious of our dogmas” (Encyclical Summo jugiter.) His predecessor, Pius VIII, in his Apostolic Letter Litteris altero, wished that those Catholics who planned to contract a marriage with a non-catholic party should be placed under the obligation of “recalling that it was a most firm teaching of our religion that outside the faith NO ONE can be saved” Pope Pius IX reiterated this principle on December 9, 1854 in stating that “ it is thus necessary to hold it to be de fide that no one can be saved outside of the Roman Catholic Church, which is the one and only Ark of salvation: those that do not enter it will perish in the flood” (Allocution. Singulari quadam)The TRUE religion has always taught this doctrine. In the old Testament,
the Jews learned this from the very mouth of Yahve: “There is NO OTHER
God beside Me, A just God and a Saviour, there is none beside Me” (Isaiah
XLV: 21). Aware that she was the only receptacle of the truth, Israel chanted”
What God is there apart from Yahve?” (Ps. XVIII ) and she made it an obligation
“to announce to all the nations that their gods were DEMONS” (1 Chron.
XV1: 26 : and Ps. XCV. 5).
Justification for this TeachingNow “God who wishes that all men be saved” (1 Tim. 2: 4) has gone so far as to condescend that we should become members of His family and has adopted us as His children. This adoption not only gives us the title, but also the reality of being the children of God because it makes us “participants in the divine nature, divinae consortes naturae.” The Apostle John could not have put it more plainly: “Behold what manner of charity the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called, and should be the sons of God” (1 John 3: 1). This is the rebirth “of the water and of the Spirit” of which Jesus spoke to Nicodemus. This divine life without which NO one can enter into the Kingdom of Heaven, is already possessed in this world by the children of God. As a result of this life, they are already Members of the “House of God” and this “House” (which must be understood in the sense of “Family”) IS the Church. The Kingdom of God starts here below. For it does not consist only of the elect who are in Heaven in their glory, the Church Triumphant; it also includes all those who have left the world in the friendship of Our Lord without having sufficiently satisfied His justice; which is to say the Church Suffering in Purgatory. Finally, it includes all those who are here below who are being proven, namely the Church Militant. The three groups of the One and Only Church of Christ form the Mystical Body and, with their Head, the complete Christ, “the fullness of Christ” (Eph. 4 ; 13 ). As a result, and in complete accord with Tradition, the true disciples of Jesus Christ believe in the absolute necessity of “Catholic unity as the ONLY means of salvation” (Gregory XV1) and, taking for their guidance from St. Cyprian, profess that “He who has NOT the Church for his Mother, CANNOT have God for his Father.” While sinners who have fallen from a state of grace, but who conserve the faith are always members of the Church Militant (Pope Pius XII recalled this in his Encyclical Mystici Corporis Christi); those who have sinned against the faith or against the unity of the Church, heretics, and schismatics, are outside the “Church which is the Mystical Body of Christ,” the one and only Ark of salvation. Such from the beginning has been the teaching of the Church with regard to the salvation of non-Catholics. The martyr St. Ignace, a disciple of the Apostles, wrote to the Philidelphians: “Make no mistake, he who follows the author of a schism will not obtain the kingdom of Heaven.” St. Augustine and the African bishops united at the Council of Cirta also taught this: “Whosoever is outside the bosom of the Catholic Church, no matter how PRAISEWORTHY he appears to be, will in NO way enjoy eternal life and the ANGER of God will remain on him because of the crime of which he is guilty by living separated from Christ.” Finally, according to Pope Gregory XVI, St. Gregory The Great expressly affirmed that “the holy universal Church teaches that God cannot be truly adored except among His own; and she affirms that all those who are separated from her cannot be saved.” (Encyclical Summo jugiter) 2 - The Teaching of the ModernistsFor them the doctrine of religious “experience” combined with that of “symbolism” consecrates every religion, including the pagan religions as true. What is to prevent such experiences from being found in any religion? In fact, that they are so maintained by not a few. On what grounds can Modernists deny the truth of an experience affirmed by a follower of Islam? Will they claim a monopoly of true experiences for Catholics alone? Indeed, Modernists do not deny, but actually maintain, some confusedly, others frankly, that ALL religions are TRUE. That they cannot feel otherwise is obvious. For on what ground, according to their theories, could falsity be predicated of any religion whatsoever?Certainly it would be either on account of the falsity of the religious sense or on account of the falsity of the formula pronounced by the mind. Now the religious sense, although it may be more perfect or less perfect, is always one and the same; and the intellectual formula, in order to be true, has to respond to the religious sense and to the believer, whatever be the intellectual capacity of the latter. In the conflict between different religions, the most that Modernists can maintain is that the Catholics have more truth because it is more vivid...” (para 14. Encycl. “Pascendi Dominici Gregis”; St. Pius X ). Moreover, even believing Modernists speak very little about the LAST ENDS OF MAN. For them only one thing is important: to believe and to be sincere in one’s faith. As to the expression of one’s faith, that is without importance since it will necessarily vary with the individual, with the times and with places. Fundamentally, to the modernist all religions are worthy and have the same right to be held in respect. The only thing which matters to the Modernist believer, the only thing that one has any right to demand from him, is sincerity. Our holy pontiff, St. Pius X wrote his damning Encyclical, “Pascendi Dominic Gregis” in 1907, exposing these vermin he called The Modernists and required of all clerics swear to the Modernist oath. Many of the recent modernist historians that examined our past church history have castigated these requirements of our holy predecessor. We believe this is the time of the Apostle where he warned of the arrival of the Man of Sin and his church, that of the Antichrist. We can find this in II Thessalonians chapter 2. And in the 24th Sunday after Pentecost, which reminds us in the Gospel of the Latter Days, we read in Matthew; 24; 15-35, where Our Lord reminded us of this time and referring to the prophecy of Daniel of that “abomination in the holy place.” Just what did Christ Our Lord in His enlightenment to Daniel mean by this statement? We now know it meant the rupture of the faith by the stealing of the Chair of Peter by those men who were never members of the Catholic Church, and many of these men were on side with Freemasons and their masters, who became the False shepherds that led millions to their damnation outside the true Fold Christ founded. But in 1958 the laity and for that matter a very large proportion of Catholic peoples never knew of John XXIII’s treachery. God knew it and it was He Who exposed Roncalli for the traitor he was by virtue of the Catholic dogma of papal Infallibility. John XXIII’s Encyclical, “Pacem In Terris,” contained many errors against the certitude of the faith. It encouraged strong Communist actions. Now it is the Definitive teaching from Revelation that the Holy Ghost protects the Vicar of Christ from teaching Error from the Chair of Peter. Since John XXIII taught Error, the only conclusion that can be reached was that this man was not the Pope. Therefore he was NEVER validly elected. Further study of his actions to the new Council he called was in fact the annunciation of a new religion. As there was then NO Pope to examine and judge him, nevertheless Catholic law did propel him, and also all those who followed him into this new religion - the Worship of Man, that expulsion by their “tacit resignation” from ALL offices in the Catholic Church (Canon Law 188 # 4). We who have been part of the Remnant Church that Christ still lived in have studied John XXIII’s part in the hand-over the faith to the enemies of Christ. We therefore declare, decree, and judge him as an apostate and therefore We excommunicate John XXIII from the womb of the Church and declare all his teachings as poisonous and erroneous and to be thrown out by the church as heretical, schismatic and finally, apostate. His successor was Paul VI, who was also eulogised by the Freemasons and that is enough to make any Catholic cautious and concerned. This man was also an Imposter and God also revealed this by exposing Paul VI as that Man of Sin foretold by St. Paul in his Epistle; II Thessalonians ch.2. This felon of the Faith - Paul VI - signed into law, by using the office of the Ordinary Magisterium to place as new dogma, all past condemned heresies as new Church teaching. This is the first time anyone sitting on the Chair of Peter took away the continuous sacrifice of the Mass, an act unprecedented in the 2,000 year history of the Church, an act that went against Christ, and therefore of the Antichrist. This was the sign to some of the faithful, for though we may have had some bad Popes in church history, we NEVER ever had one who acted against Christ and thus infamously enjoy that title of the Antichrist. This is also the same person that decreed that one faith is as good as another. His “Ecumenism” was in fact a condemned heresy as late as by Pope Pius XI in his Encyclical “Mortalium Animos.” Further this man decreed that Religious Liberty was the right of all men and decreed that it was a civil right, clearly countermanding the infallible and natural laws of God and nature that Christ founded only the ONE true religion as He was the Son of God who came on earth to fulfil the prophecies God made to Adam that He would send a Redeemer to open the gates of heaven and by His Church and not man-made false religions nor the heathen and other demonic worship as has been the case with John Paul II, who worshipped the demonic idol on the altars of the Basilica of St. Francis at Assisi on October 1986. Leo XIII teaches further: “That is why the Church has regarded as declared rebels, and has driven far from her all those who did not think as she did on no matter what point of her doctrine. Nothing could be more dangerous than those heretics who, guarding in all else the integrity of doctrine, by a single word, as by a drop of venom, corrupt the purity and the simplicity of the faith which we have received from the Tradition of Our Lord and the Apostles. This has always been the custom of the church, based upon the unanimous judgement of the Holy Fathers, who always regarded as excluded from the Catholic communion and outside the church whoever separated himself in the slightest degree from doctrine taught by the authentic magisterium.”Yes, whoever sins against faith separates himself from the mystical body of Christ which is the church, - “schism, heresy and apostasy separate a man from the Body of the Church” (Pi |